Asset Management Plan - Public Engagement Questionnaire

 

The Township of Wainfleet is committed to providing a high quality of life and exceptional services for our residents. As our community evolves, we must invest your tax dollars wisely to maintain and improve our infrastructure, including roads, bridges, and other municipal services. Your input is crucial for strategic planning and asset management. This brief questionnaire provides you with an opportunity to share your thoughts on our strengths and areas for improvement, as well as your feedback on our priorities for the coming years. The information gathered will be used to develop the forward-looking proposed levels of service for the 2025 Township of Wainfleet’s Asset Management Plan, in accordance with Ontario Regulation 588/17, which mandates municipalities to establish a strategic asset management policy and maintain an asset management plan for core and non-core municipal infrastructure assets.

We thank you in advance for completing this questionnaire. If you have questions, please contact us in person, over the phone  or on the Township's website as indicated in the footer below.

Section 1: Demographic Information

What is your current residency status in the Township of Wainfleet?
Which best describes where you live within the Township?
What best describes your household/family structure?
Please select your age range:

Section 2: Awareness and Communication Preferences

Have you read the Township's Asset Management Plan?
https://www.wainfleet.ca/town-hall/budget-and-financial-reports/asset-management

Section 3: Importance of Community Features

Questions Low Importance
(i.e. I use it monthly or rarely)
Mid Importance
(i.e. I use weekly)
High Importance
(i.e. I use it daily)
N/A
(i.e. I don’t use it)

Section 4: Importance of Municipal Services

Questions Low Importance
(i.e. I use it monthly or rarely)
Mid Importance
(i.e. I use weekly)
High Importance
(i.e. I use it daily)
N/A
(i.e. I don’t use it)

Section 5: Infrastructure Availability, Reliability, and Safety

Dissatisfied: Unacceptable availability or reliability, unacceptable quality of performance/condition (e.g. “the asset is frequently not in service, and when it is it performs poorly”) 
 

Somewhat Satisfied: Minimum availability or quality requirements for performance and/or condition are usually met (e.g. most of the time the asset is in service, and the condition is okay for my needs”)
 

Satisfied: Meets user needs majority of the time, functional requirements consistently met, and condition is satisfactory (e.g. “I’m confident the asset will be able to service my needs”)
 

Unsure: Do not use the asset grouping enough to have meaningful understanding of the availability, functionality and/or reliability of performance 
 

Not Applicable: I do not use this asset grouping
 

Questions Dissatisfied Somewhat Satisfied Satisfied Unsure N/A
Questions Dissatisfied Somewhat Satisfied Satisfied Unsure N/A
Questions Dissatisfied Somewhat Satisfied Satisfied Unsure N/A

Section 6: Desired Service Levels

 

Decrease Service Levels: Reduced availability of assets, reduced condition of asset (i.e., lower ride comfort for roads)
 

Maintain Service Levels: Existing availability and condition of assets
 

Increase Service Levels: Increased availability of assets, improved condition of assets (i.e. higher ride comfort for roads)
 

Not Applicable: I do not interact with this asset grouping

 

Questions Decrease Service Levels Maintain Service Levels Increase Service Levels N/A

Section 7: Willingness to Pay for Services

Not Willing: I do not support increased spending on this service or asset.
 

Somewhat Willing: I am open to paying more for improvements, but my support depends on factors such as cost, the specific service, or the expected benefit.
 

Willing: I would support increased spending or higher taxes/fees to improve this service.
 

Not Applicable: I do not use or interact with this service or asset.
 

Questions Not Willing Somewhat Willing Willing N/A

Section 8: Infrastructure Spending Priorities

Highly Important: These factors should be the primary drivers for consideration  
 

Somewhat Important: These factors are helpful considerations, but not primary considerations 
 

Less Important: These have the least weight on decisions, but they still may be relevant to note
 

Not Applicable: These do not apply to making spending decisions, in my opinion. 
 

Questions Less Important Somewhat Important Highly Important N/A

Section 9: Final Opinions

 

Questions Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree Unsure

Section 10: Additional Comments

 

CAPTCHA